The Reason For Code Access Security

I had a question in my inbox the other day that went something like this:

"Since programming within the partial trust sandbox I get by default when using ClickOnce is so hard, why wouldn't I just kick it up to FullTrust and let the user press the OK button?"

You can do that. Since ClickOnce supports user management of permission awarding for code deployed via ClickOnce (aka there's a dialog that the user has to approve if the app wants more permissions than are the default), you could ask for FullTrust.

If I were you, I wouldn't ask for FullTrust in my ClickOnce apps and not just because I don't want users to be freaked out by the dialog box I expect to see that says "Danger, Will Robinson, Danger, Danger!" Personally, I don't want the liability. If I write code the requires FullTrust, I have to write my code to take full responsibility for its actions, including if the code is hijacked by other code to do bad things.

On the other hand, if I request the minimal set of permissions that I need, I'm walking with a net. If I miss an exploit, I'm limited to doing bad things inside of the limited set of permissions that the user has awarded to me and not the whole darn thing.

Full trust isn't easier; it's much, much harder. I like partial trust because I'm lazy: I don't want to do the work to warrant the user's full trust.